General Market Marketing: Why It Limits Brand Growth — and What Smart Brands Do Instead

There’s a phrase that keeps coming up in my conversations with the smartest brand leaders I know: the general market is dead.

Miles Worthington, CEO of Worthi — an agency he describes as anti-general marketing — said it plainly: “The idea of, hey, we’re gonna do this one thing, it’s gonna hit everybody and move the needle — it’s just archaic. It doesn’t work anymore.”

He’s right. And the data backs him up.

But here’s what I want to add to that: general market marketing doesn’t just underperform. It actively shrinks your addressable market — and most brands don’t know it’s happening.

In this article, I want to explain exactly what general market marketing is, why it made sense historically, why it limits growth today, and what the brands that have figured this out are doing instead.

Listen on Apple Podcasts | Spotify

What Is General Market Marketing?

General market marketing is the practice of creating a single campaign, message, or customer experience designed to reach the broadest possible audience — treating the consumer population as one large, relatively uniform mass.

In traditional marketing terms, the “general market” meant the mainstream — and historically, that meant designing for the dominant culture first, and asking everyone else to find themselves in the messaging later.

It’s a melting pot model. One message. One audience. Maximum reach.

And for a long time, it made strategic sense. When there were three television channels and a handful of national magazines, mass marketing was the only viable option. You couldn’t segment at scale. You didn’t have the data. So you cast the widest net possible and hoped enough of it stuck.

That world no longer exists. But the general market marketing strategy largely persisted — not because it kept working, but because it was familiar, comfortable, and easy to defend internally.

FAQ: What is general market marketing? General market marketing is a mass marketing approach in which a brand creates a single message or campaign designed to appeal to the broadest possible consumer audience, without tailoring it to the specific identities, cultures, or lived experiences of distinct consumer communities. Historically associated with mainstream (predominantly white, non-Hispanic) audiences, the general market model treats consumers as a relatively homogeneous mass — a melting pot — rather than recognizing the many identities that shape how consumers actually evaluate and choose brands.

Why General Market Marketing Limits Brand Growth Today

Here’s what’s actually happening when a brand markets to the general market: every consumer whose identity isn’t reflected in that marketing quietly removes themselves from the brand’s addressable market.

They don’t complain. They don’t send feedback. They simply don’t convert — and they take their communities with them.

I’ve seen this play out repeatedly in my research. When I audited 50 brand websites — all of which described themselves as marketing to the general market — entire groups of people were missing from the experience. People over 50 were largely absent. People with disabilities, absent. People with larger body types and Asian consumers were sorely underrepresented. Dark-skinned Black women were nearly invisible.

The brands weren’t doing this intentionally. That’s the nature of this particular problem: it’s invisible from the inside. When your team, your agency, and your research all reflect a narrow slice of the consumer population, the gaps in your marketing become impossible to see — until you look through someone else’s eyes.

Benny F. Johnson, CEO of the American Marketing Association — the world’s largest professional community for marketers — framed it this way when I asked him directly whether general market approaches still work: “It’s a question of surviving versus thriving. If you want to separate your brand, distinguish your brand, thrive in markets — it’s going to be best to evolve to more relevant approaches to marketing.”

The business math is stark: every identity that doesn’t see itself in your marketing is no longer part of your addressable market. You think you’re reaching the masses. You’re actually shrinking your market with every person who doesn’t feel like your brand is for someone like them.

General market marketing doesn’t just underperform relative to alternatives. It actively costs you customers you already could have had.

FAQ: Why is general market marketing less effective today? General market marketing is less effective today because consumers no longer experience themselves as part of a homogeneous mass. They evaluate brands through the lens of their identity — and when a brand’s marketing doesn’t reflect their identity, they don’t convert. Demographic shifts have also fundamentally changed who the “general market” actually is: multicultural consumers now represent over 40% of the U.S. population and $7 trillion in annual buying power, meaning a strategy built around a narrow mainstream audience is missing an enormous and growing share of the market.

From Melting Pot to Mosaic: The Strategic Shift

Consumers don’t see themselves as a melting pot. They experience the world — and evaluate the brands they’ll buy from — through the lens of who they are. Black, Latino, Asian, over 50, LGBTQ+, neurodivergent, Spanish speaker, larger body type, mom. Identity is layered, specific, and real.

The market has always been this way. What’s changed is that brands can no longer afford to ignore it.

The shift smart brands are making is from a melting pot strategy to a mosaic strategy. Rather than flattening consumer differences into one undifferentiated mass, mosaic marketing recognizes and speaks to the distinct identities within that mass.

This is not niche marketing. It’s not a heritage month activation. It is a more accurate and more effective form of mass marketing strategy — one that starts with the reality of how consumers actually experience themselves, rather than the fiction of a homogeneous general market.

And critically: it doesn’t shrink your reach. It expands it.

FAQ: What is mosaic marketing? Mosaic marketing is a brand growth approach that replaces the general market model with identity-aware marketing. Rather than treating consumers as a uniform mass, mosaic marketing recognizes that consumers evaluate brands through the lens of their identity — and that when brands speak directly and authentically to those identities, they reach more people, not fewer. The “mosaic” refers to the reality that the consumer market is not a melting pot where differences disappear, but a mosaic where distinct identities coexist and each requires its own approach.

The Reach Paradox: Focused Marketing Reaches More People

The most common objection I hear from senior marketing leaders when I challenge general market thinking: “If we focus on smaller communities, won’t we limit our reach?”

It’s a logical concern. It’s also, as Miles put it, a misnomer.

“There’s a misnomer that if you are focused, you’ll only hit that audience,” he told me. “But actually you’ll hit everybody that the audience influences.”

The first season of Insecure on HBO illustrates this perfectly. The show was deeply, specifically Black — Black writer, Black director, dense cultural nuance. HBO targeted Black women. And yet the Nielsen ratings showed the show over-indexed with white women more than Black women.

Why? Because Black women are cultural influencers whose impact travels far beyond their own community. When they embrace something, the people they influence follow. The targeted approach didn’t limit the audience — it created one.

This is how McDonald’s, Coca-Cola, and General Mills grew their brands by making African American consumers their lead consumer — not a secondary audience, not a segment to address in February — because the data showed that Black consumers influence culture far beyond their 13% share of the US population.

By the end of 2025, Black, Latino, API, and queer audiences held $7 trillion in combined annual buying power. That is not a niche. That is the growth opportunity most brands are leaving on the table while they protect a general market strategy that was never as effective as they believed.

FAQ: Does focusing on specific communities limit your marketing reach? No — it typically expands it. Identity-based communities act as cultural amplifiers: when they authentically embrace a brand, their enthusiasm spreads to the people they influence, including audiences the brand never directly targeted. This is why brands like Netflix, McDonald’s, and Coca-Cola have deliberately led with specific identity communities rather than the general market — focused marketing generates broader demand, not narrower demand.

This Is Audience Segmentation — Not a DEI Initiative

This is the point I most want senior marketing leaders to hear clearly.

Identity-based marketing — mosaic marketing — is not a diversity, equity, and inclusion program. It is audience segmentation. It is customer centricity. It is how you do your job.

You already segment by age. By income. By geography. By behavior. Identity is a segmentation variable exactly like those — and for most consumer categories, it is one of the most powerful ones. The question isn’t whether you should segment by identity. The question is why this particular variable triggers hesitation when the others don’t.

Miles named the problem directly: “There’s sadly a conflation with audience-targeted marketing and DEI that is dangerous and ignorant. If you’re a marketer and you’re looking at audience data, this is just how to do your job effectively.”

I’ve seen the cost of this conflation firsthand. A client spent a year getting their identity-based marketing program approved internally. We then spent nearly a year on strategy, research, and team preparation. And then the DEI team shut it down — right before launch. A department with no responsibility for customer acquisition made a decision about brand growth, because the work had been labeled as DEI rather than what it actually was: smart audience segmentation.

That mislabeling cost them brand growth.

Marketing to distinct identity communities should be owned by the marketing team. Evaluated by growth metrics. Treated as what it is: audience segmentation that happens to use identity as the variable, because identity is one of the most powerful variables available.

FAQ: Is identity-based marketing the same as DEI? No. Identity-based marketing is a form of audience segmentation — the same discipline marketers apply when segmenting by age, income, or behavior. DEI (diversity, equity, and inclusion) refers to internal organizational practices around hiring, culture, and equity. Conflating the two causes marketing decisions about brand growth to be routed through the wrong department and evaluated against the wrong criteria — which is why many brands have seen identity-based marketing programs stalled or cancelled despite strong business cases.

What This Looks Like in Practice: The Netflix Case Study

Moving away from general market marketing isn’t just a strategic reframe. It requires building infrastructure — consistent, owned channels and ongoing strategy, not one-off campaigns.

Myles helped Netflix build exactly that, starting in 2016 when he arrived to find no multicultural marketing function at all. He and the team started small: curating monthly watch lists of Black content for Black press outlets — Essence, Ebony, and others — and doing the same for Latino and queer press.

It worked. So as Netflix scaled to producing roughly 1,000 new titles a year with limited social channels to promote them, Myles helped build owned distribution channels for specific identity communities.

Strong Black Lead launched first — a dedicated channel for Black stories and storytellers on Netflix. Then Remezcla for Latino audiences. Followed by Most for LGBTQ+ audiences. And later, Netflix Golden for API audiences. Each channel created the momentum for the one that followed.

The insight behind each channel was the same: these communities are massive, influential, and underserved by the general market model. Give them a home that speaks directly to them — and they’ll bring their networks with them.

“Just because you’re Black doesn’t mean you only watch Black things,” Myles noted. The channels bring audiences in through identity — and then expand their engagement across the entire Netflix library.

Miles has built similar infrastructure for HBO Max (three dedicated multicultural social channels) and works with Google on ongoing audience education — helping translate major product launches like Gemini to Black and Latino audiences in ways that address real barriers and build genuine relevance.

None of this is a one-off activation. All of it is ongoing strategy. That distinction is the whole point.

FAQ: What is an example of moving beyond general market marketing? Netflix’s development of identity-specific social channels — Strong Black Lead, Remezcla, Most, and Netflix Golden — is one of the clearest examples of what replacing a general market strategy looks like in practice. Rather than promoting all content through a single general market channel, Netflix built owned communities for distinct identity groups. These channels drive engagement not just with identity-specific content but with the entire Netflix catalog, demonstrating that identity-aware marketing expands brand reach rather than narrowing it.

Why Heritage Month Campaigns Don’t Replace a Real Strategy

One of the most common ways brands try to engage identity communities without fully abandoning the general market model is the heritage month campaign. A February Black History Month activation. A June Pride campaign. A Hispanic Heritage Month push.

Myles and the team at Worthi won’t take them. He’s direct about why.

“Heritage months are not for the communities you’re talking to. I don’t call my grandmother on February 1st and say, ‘Happy Black History Month, grandma.’ That’s not a holiday for us. It’s for everyone else to educate themselves.”

When Bumble came to Worthi asking for a Black History Month campaign, his response was: that won’t win Black people. If you want to actually reach this audience, show up the other eleven months.

What followed was genuine research into why Black women weren’t on Bumble — they felt unsafe, fetishized, and doubted Black men were even using the platform. The campaign Worthi built, Love Letters to Black Women, addressed those specific barriers directly. It shifted perception. It gave Black women a reason to reconsider the brand — not because it celebrated Black History Month, but because it demonstrated that Bumble actually understood and cared about their experience.

That is what authenticity requires: not representation for its own sake, but marketing that demonstrates genuine understanding of what a community actually experiences.

FAQ: Why don’t heritage month campaigns build brand loyalty with specific communities? Heritage month campaigns are often perceived as performative by the communities they target because they signal interest in a community only during a designated period rather than demonstrating consistent, genuine understanding and presence. Real brand loyalty with identity communities is built through year-round engagement that addresses the actual experiences, barriers, and needs of those communities — not through one-time activations tied to the calendar.

The Consistency Imperative

If Myles could change one thing about how brands approach identity communities, it wouldn’t be strategy, budget, or creative. It would be consistency.

“People think, ‘Oh, I did this one thing — we’re good, I checked my box.’ But with any audience, it’s consistency over time. If you show up once, that’s where questions around performative actions come up. Do you actually care? Are you doing this in March? That comes with consistency over time.”

The brands that have built durable loyalty with identity communities — McDonald’s, Coca-Cola, and General Mills decades ago; Netflix and Bumble more recently — built it by showing up consistently, year-round, in ways that demonstrate genuine understanding. Not by running a campaign and moving on.

Loyalty doesn’t come from a moment. It comes from a relationship. And relationships require consistency.

Where to Start: Moving Away from the General Market Model

If you’re ready to make the shift, Miles’s advice to CMOs is straightforward: set aside your preconceived notions and look at the data.

US demographic data alone makes the case. The communities that general market strategies most often overlook — Black, Latino, API, LGBTQ+, neurodivergent, people over 50, Spanish speakers — are not fringe audiences. They are, in many categories, the majority of future growth. Gen Z is the most racially and ethnically diverse generation in US history. By 2045, people of color will be the majority of the US population.

Then look at your category data. You’ll almost certainly find that most brands in your space are underserving these audiences. That isn’t a risk. It’s a gap in the market — and an opportunity for the brand willing to move first.

“The space that keeps marketers out of this area is preconceived notions more so than the actual data,” Miles told me. “When you look at the data, it’s telling you that these audiences are massive in size, hugely influential even outside of their own community, and have serious buying power. Go from a data perspective and a growth perspective, and you’ll always see these audiences as opportunities.”

The Connection to the 7C Frictionless Growth Marketing Framework

Moving beyond general market marketing is the strategic decision. The 7C Frictionless Growth Marketing Framework is the operating system for executing it — the complete, sequenced approach to building identity-aware marketing into every layer of your brand strategy, from your values through your customer experience to the loyalty you earn over time.Two Tools to Help You Find Your Gaps

If this raised questions about where your brand’s general market strategy might be limiting your growth, I’ve built two tools to help.

The “What’s Slowing Your Growth” Assessment takes 2–3 minutes and points you toward where friction is quietly suppressing your growth.

The Friction Finder Growth Audit is a deeper engagement — we go into your business together, identify exactly where the general market model is creating friction in your customer experience, and build a clear picture of what to address first.